MUX vs HL
Side-by-side comparison of price performance, valuation, growth, profitability, analyst targets and technical trend.
MUX · McEwen$15.48 ▲ 4.10%
HL · Hecla Mining$14.74 ▲ 2.01%
One year, rebased to 100
Each line starts at 100 so growth is directly comparable
- MUX -9.4%
- HL -1.8%
Head to head
| Metric | MUX | HL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $15.48 | $14.74 |
| Change today | ▲ 4.10% | ▲ 2.01% |
| Market cap | $949.83M | $9.90B |
| Return, 3 months | -19.3% | -16.0% |
| Return, year to date | -16.4% | -23.1% |
| Return, 1 year | -3.6% | +6.3% |
| P/E (TTM) | 12.3 | 25.9 |
| P/B | 1.3 | 3.5 |
| P/E percentile vs own 5y | 87th | 51st |
| Dividend yield | – | 0.10% |
| Revenue growth (YoY, latest qtr) | +26.8% | +52.4% |
| Net profit growth (YoY) | +216.0% | +104.3% |
| Gross margin | 30.9% | 51.7% |
| Operating margin | -2.0% | 45.9% |
| Net margin | 32.5% | 19.1% |
| Return on equity | 13.5% | 13.4% |
| Analyst target vs. price | +90.6% | +54.8% |
| Analyst buy share | 100% | 43% |
| RSI (14) | 47 | 46 |
| 30-day volatility | 59.1% | 64.4% |
| Max drawdown, 1 year | -53.0% | -58.4% |
| Trend read | Leaning bearish | Leaning bearish |
| Analyst consensus | Buy | Buy |
Green cells mark the best value in each row where "better" is clear-cut (lower P/E, higher margin). That is a reading of the numbers, not a recommendation. Financials are in each company's reporting currency.
What the numbers say
- HL is the largest of the group by market value.
- HL has returned the most over the past year.
- MUX carries the lowest trailing P/E.
- HL is growing revenue fastest.
- MUX keeps the most profit per dollar of sales.
- MUX has been the calmest stock over the last 30 days.