MH vs LRN
Side-by-side comparison of price performance, valuation, growth, profitability, analyst targets and technical trend.
MH · McGraw Hill$10.86 ▼ 3.29%
LRN · Stride$75.00 ▲ 0.17%
One year, rebased to 100
Each line starts at 100 so growth is directly comparable
- MH -1.7%
- LRN +15.0%
Head to head
| Metric | MH | LRN |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $10.86 | $75.00 |
| Change today | ▼ 3.29% | ▲ 0.17% |
| Market cap | $2.08B | $3.15B |
| Return, 3 months | -6.5% | -6.5% |
| Return, year to date | -34.2% | +15.5% |
| Return, 1 year | -4.2% | +4.2% |
| P/E (TTM) | -43.8 | 10.4 |
| P/B | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| P/E percentile vs own 5y | 81st | 4th |
| Dividend yield | – | – |
| Revenue growth (YoY, latest qtr) | +2.6% | +3.0% |
| Net profit growth (YoY) | +11,425.9% | -5.6% |
| Gross margin | 81.7% | 37.4% |
| Operating margin | 15.8% | 18.4% |
| Net margin | 4.4% | 13.2% |
| Return on equity | 17.3% | 20.9% |
| Analyst target vs. price | +61.1% | +36.7% |
| Analyst buy share | 89% | 33% |
| RSI (14) | 30 | 41 |
| 30-day volatility | 57.0% | 41.5% |
| Max drawdown, 1 year | -49.4% | -60.3% |
| Trend read | Strong downtrend | Strong downtrend |
| Analyst consensus | Buy | Buy |
Green cells mark the best value in each row where "better" is clear-cut (lower P/E, higher margin). That is a reading of the numbers, not a recommendation. Financials are in each company's reporting currency.
What the numbers say
- LRN is the largest of the group by market value.
- LRN has returned the most over the past year.
- MH carries the lowest trailing P/E.
- LRN is growing revenue fastest.
- LRN keeps the most profit per dollar of sales.
- LRN has been the calmest stock over the last 30 days.