FTS vs CCJ
Side-by-side comparison of price performance, valuation, growth, profitability, analyst targets and technical trend.
FTS · Fortis$60.10 ▼ 1.77%
CCJ · Cameco$71.30 ▲ 4.35%
One year, rebased to 100
Each line starts at 100 so growth is directly comparable
- FTS +20.9%
- CCJ -24.2%
Head to head
| Metric | FTS | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $60.10 | $71.30 |
| Change today | ▼ 1.77% | ▲ 4.35% |
| Market cap | $31.00B | $31.05B |
| Return, 3 months | +9.4% | -26.7% |
| Return, year to date | +18.6% | -22.1% |
| Return, 1 year | +21.1% | -22.6% |
| P/E (TTM) | 23.9 | 109.9 |
| P/B | 1.8 | 6.0 |
| P/E percentile vs own 5y | 95th | 47th |
| Dividend yield | 2.99% | 0.24% |
| Revenue growth (YoY, latest qtr) | +6.0% | -7.2% |
| Net profit growth (YoY) | +15.0% | -92.1% |
| Gross margin | 72.3% | 26.9% |
| Operating margin | 28.4% | 14.8% |
| Net margin | 14.3% | 10.2% |
| Return on equity | 7.7% | 5.1% |
| Analyst target vs. price | -0.6% | +71.9% |
| Analyst buy share | 33% | 88% |
| RSI (14) | 70 | 33 |
| 30-day volatility | 16.8% | 49.0% |
| Max drawdown, 1 year | -9.9% | -49.0% |
| Trend read | Strong uptrend | Strong downtrend |
| Analyst consensus | Hold | Buy |
Green cells mark the best value in each row where "better" is clear-cut (lower P/E, higher margin). That is a reading of the numbers, not a recommendation. Financials are in each company's reporting currency.
What the numbers say
- CCJ is the largest of the group by market value.
- FTS has returned the most over the past year.
- FTS carries the lowest trailing P/E.
- FTS pays the highest dividend yield.
- FTS is growing revenue fastest.
- FTS keeps the most profit per dollar of sales.
- FTS has been the calmest stock over the last 30 days.